HomeBody Armor MaterialsIs UHMWPE 15x Stronger than Steel?

Is UHMWPE 15x Stronger than Steel?

I was chatting with a friend the other day, when, after exchanging pleasantries, the subject turned to armor systems and materials. (As it often does around here.) My friend at one point asked me,

I’ve heard it said that ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene fabrics are 15 times stronger than steel wire. Is that truly the case?”

Tensile Strength

When comparing tensile strengths—essentially, how much pulling force a material can withstand before breaking—UHMWPE fibers indeed put up impressive numbers. With tensile strengths that measure roughly 4,000 megapascals (MPa), the best UHMWPE fibers far exceed mild steel wire, which typically has a tensile strength around 450 MPa. Yet, on this basis, the claim of being “15 times stronger than steel” isn’t accurate. It’s more like 8.89 times stronger.

Yet the simplicity of this comparison belies the complexity of steel as a material. Steel isn’t one material with one set of mechanical properties; it’s a fantastically diverse family of alloys with a wide range of properties—and mild steel is among the weakest of them all. Many specialized grades of steel approach or exceed the tensile strength of UHMWPE. Fully martensitic tool steel alloys can attain tensile strengths of up to 3,400 MPa, and certain grades of pearlitic steel wire reach tensile strengths of up to 6,000 MPa—and, in exceptional cases, even 7,000 MPa [1]—making them the strongest ductile materials on the planet. When compared to these high-performance steels, UHMWPE can’t claim to be stronger than steel at all, and there’s no material on the planet that’s twice as strong as those grades of steel, to say nothing of “15x as strong.”

Strength vs. Strength-to-Weight Ratio

But there’s a reason nobody makes soft armor by stacking layers of pearlitic steel wire mesh: Steel may be strong, but it’s also heavy.

In every application where weight is a key design parameter—like aerospace and body armor engineering—what matters isn’t strength, it’s specific strength, which is a material’s strength-to-weight ratio. UHMWPE is approximately eight times lighter than steel, which dramatically alters the comparison: Against mild steel, UHMWPE fibers are roughly 71 times stronger on a weight-adjusted basis, and it still holds an advantage over even the strongest pearlitic steel wire, with about 3.3 times the strength-to-weight ratio.

On account of its extremely high specific strength—its combination of high strength and low density—UHMWPE has become the material of choice for lightweight body armor. It is, however, worth noting that UHMWPE isn’t the undisputed specific strength champion. Carbon fiber, particularly the ultra-high-strength “T” grades like T1200, surpass UHMWPE in both absolute terms and in specific strength. However, carbon fiber’s brittleness limits its applicability in scenarios where damage tolerance, impact resistance, or ductility are important.

Fibers vs. Composites

There’s another consideration: The strength of an individual UHMWPE fiber might be 4,000 MPa, but those fibers are never used alone. UHMWPE is typically utilized in composite form, where vast numbers of fibers are combined with resin and laid up in sheets. These sheets are often later pressed into rigid plates or helmets. The strength of a UHMWPE composite is not the strength of a single UHMWPE fiber; it is substantially lower. How much lower has been the subject of some debate and conjecture, but it has recently been measured at 900-1,500 MPa by a research team led by Naresh Bhatnagar. [2]  Most samples clustered around the lower end of that range.

This might explain the ’15x stronger’ claim. A single UHMWPE fiber is 71x stronger than mild steel wire on a weight-adjusted basis. However, a UHMWPE fiber-resin composite, with a tensile strength of 900 MPa, would be roughly 15x stronger than mild steel wire on a weight-adjusted basis. There’s a range of possible ratios, and 15x is solidly within that range.

How does this compare to higher-performance steels?

A rather interesting finding is that the specific strength of a UHMWPE composite is ~3x higher than that of Armox Advance (tensile strength 2,200 MPa, 7.83 gm/cc) and ~4x higher than that of Armox 500 (tensile strength 1,600 MPa, 7.76 gm/cc). This is interesting because it tracks their performance in armor systems fairly well. You can make a 2-pound Level III hard armor plate from UHMWPE—without foam, coating, wrapping, etc.—whereas one from Armox Advance would need to weigh roughly 6 pounds at the same performance level, and one from Armox 500 would need to weigh roughly 8 pounds. This is a very back-of-napkin correlation and a great simplification of various qualitative differences, but it illustrates that strength and performance track even across different material types.

Conclusion: So is UHMWPE “15 times stronger than steel wire”?

In absolute terms, today’s best UHMWPE fibers are about 8.89x stronger than mild steel wire; in specific terms, however, they’re more than 70x stronger.

But if we look to UHMWPE composites, which have mechanical properties that have only recently been experimentally described, we find that 15x makes sense: Resin-infused bulk UHMWPE samples have a specific strength ~15x greater than mild steel wire.

This seems to illustrate the importance of defining terms carefully. UHMWPE is little more than half as strong as steel, 8.89x stronger than steel, >70x stronger than steel, or 15-20x stronger than steel, depending on how you define “stronger,” and which steels and UHMWPE materials you use in the comparison. Ultimately, the claim is true, but could have benefited from greater precision.

And the next time you hear in a random internet article, a TV documentary, a press release, or a trivia question that any material “is ___ times stronger than steel,” you can refer back to this example and try to figure out how they’ve derived that number.


1 – Li, Y., Raabe, D., Herbig, M., Choi, P.-P., Goto, S., Kostka, A., Yarita, H., Borchers, C., & Kirchheim, R. (2014). Segregation stabilizes nanocrystalline bulk steel with near theoretical strength. Physical Review Letters, 113(10), 106104. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.106104

2 – Kartikeya, K., Chouhan, H., Ahmed, A., & Bhatnagar, N. (2020). Determination of tensile strength of UHMWPE fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Polymer Testing, 82, 106293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106293

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here