The Army’s struggle to find a new, more flexible body armor was dealt a setback Friday when a California company’s high tech Dragon Skin vests failed to pass military testing, a senior defense official said.
After three days of testing this week, the Army determined that the body armor does not meet military body armor specifications, said the official, who declined to specify which tests the armor failed. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because the results have not yet been released. The Army paid about $170,000, to buy 30 sets of the armor for the testing.
Generally, during testing, various types of ammunition are fired at the vests, and the armor may also be subjected to extreme temperatures or environmental conditions. The body armor tests were done by H.P. White, an independent ballistic testing lab in Street, Maryland.
The Army has expressed great interest in getting more flexible bodyarmor. One of the key complaints about the armor used by troops on the battlefield is that it is too heavy and inflexible, and may lessen a soldier’s speed and agility. The current armor includes heavy hard armor in the front, back and sides.
The Dragon Skin testing was initially delayed because of a dispute over testing conditions between the Army and Pinnacle Armor of Fresno, Calif., which makes the protective gear known as Dragon Skin.
Earlier this week, the Army announced it would conduct three days of testing, signaling the dispute’s resolution.
A request for comment from Murray Neal, Pinnacle Armor’s chief executive officer, was not immediately returned.
Neal, however, has previously contended that his hard armor is high quality and its
“capabilities have been proven to be significant improvements over the current Army issue.”
He said he has nine years of ballistic data, both classified and unclassified, that show the armor taking over 40 rounds of ammunition from an AK-47, then another 150 rounds from a submachine gun, all at close range without any failure.
